USA v. APPROXIMATELY 2210.8222 OF SOL CRYPTOCURRENCY
Contents
Case 1:24-cv-03375
Document 1
Filed 12/03/24
Page 1 of 15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
APPROXIMATELY 2210.8222 OF
SOL CRYPTOCURRENCY
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 24-cv-3375
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM
Plaintiff, the United States of America, through the U.S. Attorney for the District of
Columbia, brings this verified complaint for forfeiture in a civil action in rem against
approximately 2210.8222 of Solana (“SOL”) cryptocurrency, hereinafter the “Defendant
Property,” and alleges as follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1.
Seizures are appropriate from this district, because, as of the writing of this
affidavit, the evidence has established that the criminal offenses under investigation were begun
or committed upon the high seas, or elsewhere out of the jurisdiction of any particular State or
district, and no offender is known to have, or have had, residence within any United States district.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3238.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
2.
Offense Statutes. This investigation relates to violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1030
(Computer fraud and abuse), 18 U.S.C. § (Wire fraud), 18 U.S.C. …
Document 1
Filed 12/03/24
Page 1 of 15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
APPROXIMATELY 2210.8222 OF
SOL CRYPTOCURRENCY
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 24-cv-3375
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM
Plaintiff, the United States of America, through the U.S. Attorney for the District of
Columbia, brings this verified complaint for forfeiture in a civil action in rem against
approximately 2210.8222 of Solana (“SOL”) cryptocurrency, hereinafter the “Defendant
Property,” and alleges as follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1.
Seizures are appropriate from this district, because, as of the writing of this
affidavit, the evidence has established that the criminal offenses under investigation were begun
or committed upon the high seas, or elsewhere out of the jurisdiction of any particular State or
district, and no offender is known to have, or have had, residence within any United States district.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3238.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
2.
Offense Statutes. This investigation relates to violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1030
(Computer fraud and abuse), 18 U.S.C. § (Wire fraud), 18 U.S.C. …